Updates / Notes
No updates other than an unprecedented week of failure by the model. This was particularly shocking as, by this point in the season, I expected teams to have statistics that would serve as strong indicators of their future success (given the number of conference games played at this point in the year)1. This sort of result is something I would have expected much earlier in the year, but to see it in week 10 is shocking.
Week 10 Statistics
Home/Away Model:
- Base Version Record: 30-21
- Base Version Accuracy: 58.82%
– - Slimmed Version Record: 30-21
- Slimmed Version Accuracy: 58.82%
– - Agree-Disagree Between Versions: 49-2
- Disagreement Percentage: 3.92%
Neutral Site Model:
- Base Version Record: 1-0
- Base Version Accuracy: 100.00%
– - Slimmed Version Record: 1-0
- Slimmed Version Accuracy: 100.00%
– - Agree-Disagree Between Versions: 1-0
- Disagreement Percentage: 100.00%
Combined:
- Base Version Record: 31-21
- Base Version Accuracy: 59.62%
– - Slimmed Version Record: 31-21
- Slimmed Version Accuracy: 59.62%
– - Agree-Disagree Between Versions: 50-2
- Disagreement Percentage: 3.85%
Notable Predictions
#20 Texas over #9 Vanderbilt (78.76% base, 78.38% slimmed)
Most Unlikely Outcomes
West Virginia over Houston (6.36% base, 4.79% slimmed)
Kentucky over Auburn (8.72% base, 9.78% slimmed)
Oregon State over Washington State (17.65% base, 18.54% slimmed)
Biggest Nailbiters
#21 Michigan over Purdue; 21-16 (Michigan Win: 96.51% base, 96.11% slimmed)
Running Totals
Home/Away Model:
- Base Version Record: 219-94
- Base Version Accuracy: 69.97%
– - Slimmed Version Record: 216-98
- Slimmed Version Accuracy: 68.79%
– - Agree-Disagree Between Versions: 301-12
- Disagreement Percentage: 3.83%
Neutral Site Model:
- Base Version Record: 3-1
- Base Version Accuracy: 75.00%
– - Slimmed Version Record: 4-0
- Slimmed Version Accuracy: 100.00%
– - Agree-Disagree Between Versions:3-1
- Disagreement Percentage: 75.00%
Combined:
- Base Version Record: 222-95
- Base Version Accuracy: 70.03%
– - Slimmed Version Record: 220-98
- Slimmed Version Accuracy: 69.18%
– - Agree-Disagree Between Versions: 304-13
- Disagreement Percentage: 4.10%
Full Breakdown of Results
Given that the Personal Plan in WordPress doesn’t allow for plugins to be installed, I can’t embed data tables into these pages without running into a ton of formatting issues.
To see the full breakdown of results, please follow the Google Drive link to the Excel document below:
- The model was trained on season-end statistics. For more information/context, see the Constraints section of this article. ↩︎

Leave a comment